| British Columbia Court Reasons for Judgement 
                    – July 12, 2002
                    
                       
                        | Citation: Endean v. Canadian Red Cross Society et 
                          al 
 |  | Date: 20020712 |   
                        | 2002 BCSC 1028 |  | Docket: C965349 |   
                        |  |  | Registry: Vancouver |  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIABETWEEN:ANITA ENDEAN, AS REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFF
 PLAINTIFF
 AND:THE CANADIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY
 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT
 OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
 AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
 DEFENDANTS
 AND:PRINCE GEORGE REGIONAL HOSPITAL,
 DR. WILLIAM GALLIFORD, DR. ROBERT HART DYKES,
 DR. PETER HOUGHTON, DR. JOHN DOE,
 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
 AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT
 OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
 THIRD PARTIES
 PROCEEDING UNDER THE CLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT,R.S.B.C. 1996, C. 50
 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THEHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PITFIELD
  
                    
                       
                        | Counsel for the British Columbia Joint Committee |  | J.J. Camp, Q.C. S.D. Matthews
 
 |   
                        | Counsel for the Fund: Counsel for the Federal Crown:
 Counsel for the Provincial Crown:
 
 |  | W.A. Ferguson W. Divoky
 C. Prowse
 |   
                        | Date and Place of Hearing: |  | June 27, 2002 |   
                        |  |  | Vancouver, B.C. |  
                     The British Columbia Member of the Joint Committee responsible 
                      for the administration of the 1986 - 1990 Hepatitis C Settlement 
                      Agreement applies for an order amending the Transfused HCV 
                      Plan and the Hemophiliac HCV Plan to permit the payment 
                      of $5,000 and interest withheld from qualified recipients 
                      pursuant to s. 4.01(1)(b) of each Plan and to remove the 
                      holdback requirement in relation to future claimants. Similar 
                      applications have been made by the Joint Committee Member 
                      in the Ontario and Quebec class actions. 
I have reviewed the reasons of Winkler J. in Parsons et 
                      al v. The Canadian Red Cross Society et al released July 
                      11, 2002, No. 98-CV-141369CP (S.C.J.) allowing the application 
                      by the Joint Committee Member in the Ontario action.
I agree with the reasons and the result. The application 
                      of the Joint Committee in the British Columbia action is 
                      granted, the amounts withheld shall be paid together with 
                      interest, and the Transfused and Hemophiliac Plans are amended 
                      to delete the holdback requirement stipulated in s. 4.01(1)(b) 
                      of each Plan. “The Honourable Mr. Justice Pitfield”
  
                    
                   |