|
Documents : Standard
Operating Procedures : Non-Prescription Intravenous Drug
Use
Standard Operating
Procedure
SOP - NON-PRESCRIPTION INTRAVENOUS
DRUG USE
- This SOP applies where:
-
a declaration has not been made in accordance
with s.3.01(1)(c) or s.3.02(a) of the Transfused
HCV Plan or the Hemophiliac HCV Plan that
the person claimed to be an HCV Infected Person
never used non-prescription intravenous drugs;
- despite a declaration having been made in
accordance with s.3.01(1)(c) or s.3.02(a) of
the Plans that the person claimed to be an HCV
Infected Person never used non-prescription
intravenous drugs, the Administrator has reasonable
cause to believe that a person claimed to be
an HCV Infected Person has used non-prescription
intravenous drugs on at least one occasion.
Eligibility Criteria Where This SOP Applies
- Where this SOP applies, the Administrator must
undertake sufficient investigation and receive
sufficient information and cooperation in obtaining
information from the claimant to be satisfied
on the balance of probabilities that:
-
in the case of a person applying under the
Transfused HCV Plan, the person claimed to
be an HCV Infected Person was infected for
the first time with HCV by a Blood transfusion
received in Canada in the Class Period or
was infected for the first time by a Spouse
who is a Primarily-Infected Person/Opted-Out
Primarily-Infected Person or by a Parent who
is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out HCV Infected
Person, as the case may be; or
- in the case of a person applying under the
Hemophiliac HCV Plan, the person claimed to
be an HCV Infected Person was infected for the
first time with HCV by receipt of Blood or was
infected for the first time by a Spouse who
is a Primarily-Infected Hemophiliac/Opted-Out
Primarily-Infected Hemophiliac or a Parent who
is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out HCV Infected
Person, as the case may be.
- The burden to prove eligibility is on the claimant.
The Administrator shall assist the claimant by
advising what types of evidence will be useful
in meeting the burden of proof in accordance with
this SOP.
- Where this SOP applies to a person claimed to
be an HCV Infected Person applying under the Transfused
HCV Plan, the Administrator must, unless the person
claimed to be a Primarily-Infected Person was
under the age of 18 at the time of his or her
transfusion(s) and reliable evidence establishes
that his or her non-prescription intravenous drug
use only took place after July 1, 1990:
- request a traceback be conducted under the
Traceback CAP, except in the case of a person
claimed to be a Secondarily-Infected Person
who has no history of Blood transfusion; and
-
where the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person has admitted or the evidence obtained
suggests that the person claimed to be an
HCV Infected Person engaged in non-prescription
intravenous drug use prior to 1986, investigate
whether the time of the infection and the
disease history in the person claimed to be
an HCV Infected Person is most consistent
with the time of the transfusion(s)/ alleged
secondary infection or the time of the non-prescription
intravenous drug use or both as indicated
by the totality of the evidence and to do
so the Administrator must obtain the opinion
of a physician with experience in treating
and diagnosing HCV infection.
-
Where this SOP applies to an HCV Infected Person
applying under the Hemophiliac HCV Plan, the
Administrator must determine whether the time
of the infection and the disease history in
the person claimed to be an HCV Infected Person
is most consistent with the time of the receipt
of Blood/alleged secondary infection or the
time of the non-prescription intravenous drug
use or both as indicated by the totality of
the evidence and to do so the Administrator
must obtain the opinion of a physician with
experience in treating and diagnosing HCV infection,
unless:
-
the person claimed to be a Primarily-Infected
Hemophiliac was under the age of 18 at the
time he or she received Blood and reliable
evidence establishes that his or her non-prescription
intravenous drug use only took place after
July 1, 1990; or
- the person claimed to be a Primarily-Infected
Hemophiliac was a regular recipient of Blood
prior to his or her attaining the age of 18.
Discretionary Investigations
- The Administrator may undertake any other investigations
it, in its complete discretion, deems appropriate.
Examples are:
-
require that the person claiming to be an
HCV Infected Person attend an independent
medical examination with a physician of the
Administrator's choice, to obtain opinion
evidence on any medical issues which the Administrator
believes will assist in making its decision,
including:
-
whether the time of the infection and the
disease history in the person claimed to
be an HCV Infected Person is most consistent
with the time of the receipt of Blood/transfusion(s)/alleged
secondary infection or the time of the non-prescription
intravenous drug use; and/or
-
where a person asserts that non-prescription
intravenous drug use took place on only
isolated occasion(s) and/or after 1990,
whether there is any medical evidence which
will assist in determining whether that
assertion is correct;
-
for the purposes of determining whether non-prescription
intravenous drug use took place at any time
other than those asserted by the claimant,
or for the purpose of assessing whether the
disease history of a person claimed to be
an HCV Infected Person is consistent with
the time of receipt of Blood/transfusion(s)/alleged
secondary infection, obtain and review the
medical and clinical records from all hospitalizations
and treating physicians from the 18th birthday
of the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person.
-
ascertain whether the person claimed to be
an HCV Infected Person has ever donated blood
in Canada. If so, the Administrator shall
make inquiries of the Canadian Blood Services
and/or Hema-Quebec as to the donation history,
transmissible disease information, deferral
codes and the results of any lookbacks pertaining
to blood donated by the person claimed to
be an HCV Infected Person;
-
obtain an affidavit from the person claimed
to be an HCV Infected Person (if not deceased)
and a person who knew the person claimed to
be an HCV Infected Person at the time he or
she used non-prescription intravenous drugs
describing:
-
whether the drug paraphernalia used was
sterile;
-
whether the person claimed to be an HCV
Infected Person shared needles; and
-
the best estimate of the number occasions
and time period during which the person
claimed to be an HCV Infected Person used
non-prescription intravenous drugs;
-
obtain consent to conduct a criminal records
search of the person claimed to be an HCV
Infected Person; and/or
-
interview any person the Administrator believes
may have knowledge about the non-prescription
intravenous drug use or disease history of
the person claimed to be an HCV Infected Person.
Results of the Mandatory Investigations and
Discretionary Investigations:
Transfused HCV Plan
-
If the results of the traceback investigations
are such that the Traceback CAP requires the
Administrator to reject the claim of the person
claimed to be an HCV Infected Person under the
Transfused HCV Plan, the Administrator shall
reject the claim.
-
If the Traceback CAP does not require the Administrator
to reject the claim, the Administrator shall
weigh the totality of evidence obtained from
the mandatory investigations and discretionary
investigations and determine whether, on a balance
of probabilities, the person claimed to be an
HCV Infected Person under the Transfused HCV
Plan was infected for the first time by a Blood
transfusion received in Canada during the Class
Period or was infected for the first time by
a Spouse who is a Primarily-Infected Person/Opted-Out
Primarily-Infected Person or by a Parent who
is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out HCV Infected
Person, as the case may be. The Administrator
must be satisfied that the body of evidence
on which it is making its decision is sufficiently
complete in all of the circumstances of the
particular case before making a decision. In
particular, if the Administrator has concerns
that the body of evidence is not complete, it
should request and review medical records as
described in paragraph 6(b) of this SOP.
-
The following factors are in favour of a finding
that the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person was infected for the first time by a
Blood transfusion received in Canada during
the Class Period or was infected for the first
time by a Spouse who is a Primarily-Infected
Person/Opted-Out Primarily Infected Person or
by a Parent who is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out
HCV Infected Person, as the case may be:
-
an HCV antibody positive Class Period donor;
-
the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person was under the age of 18 at the time
of his or her transfusion and reliable evidence
establishes that his or her non-prescription
intravenous drug use took place after July
1, 1990;
-
a disease history which is most consistent
with the time of transfusion(s) for which
an HCV antibody positive Class Period donor
has been located/alleged secondary infection
and not consistent with the time of non-prescription
intravenous drug use;
-
reasonably reliable evidence which establishes
that the non-prescription intravenous drug
use history is subsequent to the date of transfusion(s)/alleged
secondary infection;
-
there is reasonably reliable evidence which
establishes that the non-prescription intravenous
drug use was limited to a single occasion
and was done with sterile equipment which
was not shared; and/or
-
the medical records do not reveal a history
of unspecified Hepatitis, Hepatitis B or Non-A,
Non-B Hepatitis prior to the date of the Class
Period transfusion(s)/ alleged secondary infection.
-
The following factors are against a finding
that the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person was infected for the first time by a
Blood transfusion received in Canada during
the Class Period or was infected for the first
time by a Spouse who is a Primarily-Infected
Person/Opted-Out Primarily-Infected Person or
by a Parent who is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out
HCV Infected Person, as the case may be:
-
no HCV antibody positive Class Period donor;
-
a disease history which is consistent with
infection at the time of non-prescription
intravenous drug use;
-
reasonably reliable evidence indicates that
the non-prescription intravenous drug use
took place on more than one occasion or was
done with non-sterile or shared equipment;
-
the medical records indicate a history of
unspecified Hepatitis, Hepatitis B or Non-A,
Non-B Hepatitis prior to the date of the Class
Period transfusion(s)/ alleged secondary infection;
-
the person making the claim refuses to permit
the Administrator to interview any person
the Administrator believes may have knowledge
about the non-prescription intravenous drug
use or disease history of the person claimed
to be an HCV Infected Person;
-
there is a conviction for a crime which relates
to non-prescription intravenous drugs; and/or
-
a CBS or Hema-Quebec donor file which indicates
that the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person:
-
tested positive for the antibodies to Hepatitis
B;
-
had donated blood prior to his or her Blood
transfusion(s) during the Class Period/alleged
secondary infection and the pre-Class Period
donations or recipients of the pre-Class
Period donations have subsequently tested
positive for the antibodies to Hepatitis
C; and/or
-
the file is in any other way consistent
with infection with HCV and/or non-prescription
intravenous drug use prior to the Class
Period Blood transfusion(s)/alleged secondary
infection.
Hemophiliac HCV Plan
-
If the person claimed to be a Primarily-Infected
Hemophiliac applying under the Hemophiliac HCV
Plan was a regular recipient of Blood prior
to his or her attaining the age of 18, the Administrator
shall accept the claim.
-
The Administrator shall weigh the totality
of evidence obtained from the mandatory investigations
and discretionary investigations and determine
whether, on a balance of probabilities, the
person claimed to be an HCV Infected Person
under the Hemophiliac HCV Plan was infected
for the first time by Blood or was infected
for the first time by a Spouse who is a Primarily-Infected
Hemophiliac/Opted-Out Primarily-Infected Hemophiliac
or a Parent who is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out
HCV Infected Person, as the case may be. The
Administrator must be satisfied that the body
of evidence on which it is making its decision
is sufficiently complete in all of the circumstances
of the particular case before making a decision.
In particular, if the Administrator has concerns
that the body of evidence is not complete, it
should request and review medical records as
described in paragraph 6(b) of this SOP.
-
The following factors are in favour of a finding
that the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person was infected for the first time by Blood
or was infected for the first time by a Spouse
who is a Primarily-Infected Hemophiliac/Opted-Out
Primarily-Infected Hemophiliac or a Parent who
is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out HCV Infected
Person, as the case may be:
-
his or her disease history is most consistent
with the time of receipt of Blood/alleged
secondary infection and not consistent with
the time of non-prescription intravenous drug
use;
-
there is reasonably reliable evidence which
establishes that the non-prescription intravenous
drug use history is subsequent to the date
of receipt of Blood/alleged secondary infection;
and/or
-
the non-prescription intravenous drug use
was limited to a single occasion and was done
with sterile equipment which was not shared.
-
The following factors are against a finding
that the person claimed to be an HCV Infected
Person was infected for the first time by Blood
or was infected for the first time by a Spouse
who is a Primarily-Infected Hemophiliac/Opted-Out
Primarily-Infected Hemophiliac or a Parent who
is an HCV Infected Person/Opted-Out HCV Infected
Person, as the case may be:
-
his or her disease history is consistent
with infection at the time of non-prescription
intravenous drug use;
-
there is reasonably reliable evidence which
indicates that the non-prescription intravenous
drug use took place on more than one occasion
or was done with non-sterile or shared equipment;
-
the person making the claim refuses to permit
the Administrator to interview treating physicians,
family members or associates; and/or
-
there is a conviction for a
crime which relates to non-prescription intravenous
drugs.
Disclaimer
This Standard Operating Procedure is intended
to assist the reader with respect to the subject
matter and the procedures set forth in this
Standard Operating Procedure, however, in the
event there is any difference or ambiguity between
this Standard Operating Procedure and the 1986-1990
Hepatitis C Settlement Agreement such difference
or ambiguity will be governed by and will be
resolved by the terms of the 1986-1990 Hepatitis
Settlement Agreement.
|
Top
|
|