logo
Hepatitis C - Class Actions Settlement
HomeSearchContact UsFrançaisPrivacy

Claimants:
Essential Information
Claimants:
Additional Information
Claimants:
Loss of Income / Loss of Support / Loss of Services
Periodic Re-Assessment by the Courts
Appeals
Documents
Forms
Contacts and Links
Annual Reports
Administrator


Appeals : Arbitrator Decisions : #131 - March 24, 2004

D E C I S I O N

Hepatitis C Claim No. 4777

Review of Decision of the Plan Administrator
and Arbitration Award

1. On October 16, 2003, the Plan Administrator denied an application by this Claimant for compensation under the 1986-1990 Hepatitis C Settlement Agreement.

2. Claimant #4777 requested that an arbitrator review that decision and included with the Request for Review copies of hospital records and letters from his doctor.

3. During a telephone hearing on March 15, 2004, the claimant acknowledged the following:

  a) The claimant's physician completed the Treating Physician Form on November 17, 2000. In answer to Question 1 of Section F of, the physician stated that the Claimant received Blood transfusions outside the period January 1, 1986 to July 1, 1990. Moreover, in answer to Question 2 which asks, "Having regard to the definition of Blood, did the Primary-Infected Hemophiliac (or person with Thalassemia Major) receive or take Blood (or a Blood transfusion) in the period January 1, 1986 to July 1, 1990?" the physician answered "No."
 
b) In a letter dated July 31, 2003, the Claimant stated that "the Health Sciences Centre has no record of me getting any Blood Products from the time of Jan 1st 1986 to July 1st 1990."
 
c) The Claimant had no other information that he received Blood or a Blood transfusion during the Class Period as defined in both the 1986-1990 Hepatitis C Settlement Agreement and the Transfused HCV Plan.

4. Article 3.01 of the Plan requires a claimant to provide the Administrator with records "demonstrating that the claimant received a Blood transfusion during the Class Period."

5. Claimant #4777 has not produced, and acknowledges that he cannot produce, evidence that he received a Blood transfusion during the defined period.

6. The terms of the Settlement Agreement are clear in recognizing only those claims that relate to persons who received Blood transfusions during the defined period of January 1, 1986 to July 1, 1990.

7. The decision of the Administrator to deny this claim is upheld.


Dated at Winnipeg, Manitoba this 24th day of March, 2004.


Harvey L. Secter
Arbitrator




 

Disclaimer